Eagle Forum: 200 W 3rd St., Ste. 502 • Alton, IL 62002 • 618-433-8990

Montana Thank these 8 Senators for Opposing Constitutional Convention



Montana:

Please Encourage these 8 Republican Senators who

oppose SJR4

 

We are still waiting for VOTE in the Whole Senate

SJ4 Constitutional Convention on a Balanced Budget

 

Supreme Court Justice Scalia called it a “horrible idea” to hold a constitutional convention in the age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do,”

 

MESSAGE: Thank you for opposing SJ4, the Article V Constitutional Convention for a Balanced Budget. The only way to balance the budget is to raise taxes or cut spending. There is no requirement in Montana’s Article V Balanced Budget applications that prohibits tax increases and in case of an “emergency,” the balance budget requirements would have to be set aside. Because Montana receives 46% of its state revenue from the Federal Government taxes would have to be raised on Montanans. An Article V Convention cannot be limited to a single subject. It will open the Constitution to unlimited changes. Thank you again for opposing SJ4. (Or better yet write your own message) Much more information is below.

 

These Republican Senators are identified as opposing SJ4Please Thank Them.

Becky.Beard@legmt.govwyliegaltformt@gmail.comgregg.hunter77@gmail.comForrest.Mandeville@legmt.govTheresa.Manzella@legmt.govbobphalen@midrivers.comRuss.Tempel@legmt.govShelley.Vance@legmt.gov,

 

A Balanced Budget Amendment Just Won’t Work

Like We’d Like It To Work

Janine Hansen, Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman,

director@nevadafamilies.org, eagle@eagleforum.org

 

The only way to balance a budget is to raise taxes or cut spending? There is no requirement in Article V Balanced Budget applications like Montana’s that prohibits tax increases and in case of an “emergency,” the balance budget requirements would have to be set aside.

 

Montana receives 46.58% of its state revenue from the Federal Government. Montana would have to raise taxes if a Federal Balanced Budget Amendment was adopted to cover the 46% of state revenue that comes from the Federal Government. https://smartasset.com/data-studies/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2022

 

State Legislators, both Republicans and Democrats, continue to vote for Federal Mandates and money. How can they honestly say they support limiting spending by the Federal Government when they continue to vote to take more money from the Feds?

 

The Balanced Budget sounds very good to conservatives. We wish there was an easy way to reign in the out-of-control spending of the Federal Government. However, the Constitution is not the problem. The Federal Government has ignored the Enumerated Powers listed in the Constitution and spends money on countless things that are not authorized by the Constitution, like education. If a Balanced Budget Amendment was in the Constitution it would make matters worse by actually constitutionally authorizing Federal Spending outside of the Enumerated Powers.

 

An Article V Convention should be of great concern, especially to small population conservative states like Montana. Article V does not tell us how many delegates there will be or how they will be selected. But, “Between 1973 and 1992, 22 bills were introduced in the U.S. House and 19 in the U.S. Senate that sought to establish a procedural framework that would apply to an Article V Convention…The Senate… passed the ‘Federal Constitutional Convention Procedures Act,’ on two separate occasions; as S 215 in 1971 and as S 1272 in 1983.” Although these bills did not pass Congress, they asserted Congress’s intent on setting the formula for delegates and all other procedures for an Article V Convention. Source Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2014. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20140411_R42589_f565d06c544815456eb3805d4f52c2b5749d36b7.pdf

 

These bills called for proportional representation of States based on the formula for the Electoral College, which adds the state’s number of Congressmen and 2 Senators, not one vote per stateSo, Montana would have 4 votes and California 54 at a Convention.  As a conservative that’s very scary.

 

California, which will be a participant in an Article V Constitutional Convention, passed in September 2023 an application for an Article V Convention which completely guts the Second Amendment. Eagle Forum has long contended that an Article V Constitutional Convention for proposing amendments would result in the loss of our Second Amendment Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms. In addition, we know the Electoral College would be in jeopardy because already 17 states and the District of Columbia have passed the National Popular Vote Compact. Thankfully there is push back nationally to the “woke” agenda, but we still at are risk of losing our Freedom of Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion in a Constitutional Conventionhttps://eagleforum.org/topics/2nd-amendment/article-v-constitutional-convention-threatens-our-second-amendment.html

 

In 2012 the National Republican Committee adopted a Resolution opposing all Article V Constitutional Convention applications and for good reason. Their Resolution still stands.

 

With all of these concerns about a BBA, the greatest concern is that an Article V Constitutional Convention cannot be limited.

 

Phyllis Schlafly the founder of Eagle Forum often quoted Chief Justice Warren Burger as the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

In addition, in 2015 the New Jersey Law Journal reported that Supreme Court Justice “Scalia called it ‘a horrible idea’ to hold a constitutional convention in this age of special interests.”

 

What can we do with an out-of-control Federal Government? Elections are a big answer, just as we witnessed in the 2024 election. State Legislators can refuse federal mandates and federal money. One encouraging sign is that States have realized they can push back against Federal Bullying. Texas is a prime example. They have passed laws to deal in their state with the massive illegal immigration invasion and 25 state Governors are supporting them.

 

The Balanced Budget Amendment won’t work and will result in higher taxes. Let’s not take a chance on losing our precious fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.


Idaho CRITICAL Call or Text 8 house members. Oppose Constitutional Convention!




No vote in Idaho yet.

 

CRITICAL! Please Call or Text these 4 House members:

Vote No on HCR10 and HCR9. Oppose Constitutional Convention bills.

 

                           Office              Cell or home

David M. Cannon (208) 332-1086 (208) 332-1086

DCannon@house.idaho.gov,

 

Jeff Ehlers (208) 332-1072      (208) 278-2818

JEhlers@house.idaho.gov,

 

Brandon Mitchell (208) 332-1175 (208) 596-5001

BMitchell@house.idaho.gov,

 

Douglas T. Pickett (208) 332-1123 (208) 450-5615

DPickett@house.idaho.gov

 

Then Call or Text these 4 House members:

 

                          Office                Cell or home             

Rod Furniss (208) 332-1056    (208) 589-1100    

RFurniss@house.idaho.gov

 

Lori McCann (208) 332-1184    (208)743-5517     

LMcCann@house.idaho.gov

 

Mike J. Pohanka (208) 332-1174 (208) 490-4709 

MPohanka@house.idaho.gov,

 

Jerald Raymond (208) 332-1183 (208) 317-8777 

JRaymond@house.idaho.gov,



MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HCR10 which makes applications to Congress for 3 separate Article V Constitutional Conventions for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. And Vote NO on HCR9 the Article V Commissioners bill. There is no way to limit an Article V Convention. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea,” to hold a constitutional convention in the age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.” After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda. Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information is below. My submitted testimony is below.

 

HCR 10: Article V Constitutional Convention with 3 Separate Applications Including the Balancing the Federal Budget, from Convention of States: imposing fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government and Term Limits.

HCR 9: Article V Commissioners Bill which attempts to limit Convention Commissioners from Idaho by recalling them if they have exceeded the “scope of his authority.” At the same time, the Article V Constitutional Convention continues with less representation from Idaho. This legislation is only to allay fears of a Convention.

 

 Copy of HCR 10: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/HCR010.pdf

Text of HCR9: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2023/legislation/HCR009.pdf

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

More information from Eagle Forum:

https://eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html

 

Janine Hansen’s submitted testimony.

Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

February 17, 2026

 

Chairman and Members of the Committee. My name is Janine Hansen and I represent National Eagle Forum.

 

I was intrigued when I read HJR10 which includes three separate Article V Constitutional Convention applications for proposing amendments. We can envision the jeopardy one Constitutional Convention could place our nation in with so many competing States, amendments, ideas, special interests, and political agendas. But think of having three separate Conventions. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea” in this age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.”

 

We all hope President Trump will be successful in realigning our Federal Budget. A Balanced Budget Amendment would require taxes to be increased or spending to be cut. Idaho receives 41.08% of its state revenue from the Federal Government. So, a Balanced Budget would mean Idaho would have to significantly raise taxes. Of course, in case of emergency the Balanced Budget can be set aside. President Trump has declared a state of emergency because of the border and a national energy emergency. 

 

The Convention of States language is the broadest and opens every Section of the Constitution to amendment. In fact, in the COS Pocket Guide, they propose dozens of possible amendments. COS’s language “to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government,” was the purpose of the original Constitution. There was nothing wrong with the Constitution, but the 16th Amendment income tax and 17th Amendment direct election of Senators, both approved by the states, simply destroyed Federalism and the balance of power between the states and the federal government. Now every school district, city, county, and state is controlled by the Federal government through money, grants, and mandates. As State Legislators, you have the power to refuse federal money and mandates and turn back the tide of the overreaching federal government.

 

Until states get serious about rejecting federal money and mandates COS’s language of “imposing fiscal restraints on the federal government” will simply be impossible. Which state legislator as a delegate at a national Constitutional Convention will vote to defund their state of between 31% to 56% they receive from the federal government?

 

Of course, Article V has no language about how delegates are chosen. We can anticipate that every state will be there including California. Past Congressional bills regarding Article V rules always use the measure of the number of Electoral College votes each state has. So, California would have 54 and Idaho 4. California in 2023 passed an Article V application calling for the gutting of the Second Amendment.

 

Lastly, we have term limits for every election. Please vote No on HCR10. Thank you.


Alert NEBRASKA hearing Wed 3 Constitutional Convention Bills



Alert Nebraska

Three Article V Constitutional Convention Bills

 

HEARING Wednesday, Feb. 26, 1:30pm, Room 1507

Government, Military, and Veteran Affairs Committee

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on LR14 removing the Sunset on the Convention of States passed in 2022. Was the Sunset just a gimmick to get COS passed?  Vote NO on LR21 Article V Constitutional Convention for Term Limits. We have term limits every election. We don’t need to jeopardize our Constitution for term limits. Vote NO on LB 259 the so-called Faithful Delegate bill. After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda making a Faithful Delegate bill meaningless. Supreme Court Justice Scalia said it is a “horrible idea” to hold a constitutional convention in the age of special interests. Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.” Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment.  (Or better yet write your own message) See the Article on the Second Amendment below.

 

Please EMAIL all Senators on the Committee:

Chairperson: Sen. Rita Sanders           rsanders@leg.ne.gov 

                     Sen. Bob Anderson         bandersen@leg.ne.gov 

                     Sen. John Cavanaugh   jcavanaugh@leg.ne.gov 

                     Sen. Dunixi Guereca       dguereca@leg.ne.gov   

                     Sen. Megan Hunt           mhunt@leg.ne.gov       

                     Sen. Dan Lonowski         dlonowski@leg.ne.gov  

                     Sen. Dan McKeon           dmckeon@leg.ne.gov   

                     Sen. Dave Wordekemper

  dwordekemper@leg.ne.gov 

 

Copy and Paste EMAILS: rsanders@leg.ne.govbandersen@leg.ne.gov, cavanaugh@leg.ne.govdguereca@leg.ne.govmhunt@leg.ne.govdlonowski@leg.ne.govdmckeon@leg.ne.govdwordekemper@leg.ne.gov 

 

Link to LR14: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Intro/LR14.pdf

Link to LR21: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Intro/LR21.pdf

Link to LB259: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Intro/LB259.pdf

 

Further Information:

IDAHO: Vote Entire House: WED Oppose Constitutional Convention



 Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

www.eagleforum.orgeagle@eagleforum.org

February 18, 2025


When you forward please delete bottom portion which says unsubscribe or someone will unsubscribe for you.



Please share with Friends and Family.

We need your help! Please CALL or TEXT and Email

 

IDAHO HCR 10 and HCR9 passed the House Committee and now we expect a vote as early as Wednesday,

Feb 19 after 11am

 

HCR 10: Article V Constitutional Convention with 3 Separate Applications including the Balancing the Federal Budget, from Convention of States: imposing fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government and Term Limits.

HCR 9: Article V Commissioners Bill which attempts to limit Convention Commissioners from Idaho by recalling them if they have exceeded the “scope of his authority.” At the same time the Article V Constitutional Convention continues with less representation from Idaho. This legislation is only to allay fears of a Convention.

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HCR10 which makes applications to Congress for 3 separate Article V Constitutional Conventions for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. And Vote NO on HCR9 the Article V Commissioners bill. There is no way to limit an Article V Convention. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea,” to hold a constitutional convention in the age of special interests. Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.” After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda. Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information below. My submitted testimony below.

 

Please CALL or TEXT the Republican House members listed below. The first number is their office number at the Capitol. The second number listed as a home number is probably a cell number.

Kevin Andrus (208) 332-1045 (208) 240-0201

Chris Bruce (208) 332-1055 none listed

Tanya Burgoyne (208) 332-1031 (208) 252-5502

David M. Cannon (208) 332-1086 (208) 332-1086

Brent Crane (208) 332-1058 (208) 466-0613

Jaron Crane (208) 812-2059 (208) 812-2059

Jeff Ehlers (208) 332-1072 (208) 278-2818

Dori Healey (208) 332-1176 (208) 718-0464

James Holtzclaw (208) 332-1041 (208) 284-9542

Steve Miller (208) 332-1061 (208) 332-1061

Brandon Mitchell (208) 332-1175 (208) 596-5001

Jason A. Monks (208) 332-1036 (208) 884-8684

Joe A. Palmer (208) 332-1062 (208) 332-1062

Douglas T. Pickett (208) 332-1123 (208) 450-5615

Charlie Shepherd (208) 332-1067 (208) 859-0023

Josh Tanner (208) 332-1057 (208) 781-5211

Steve C. Tanner (208) 332-1063 (208) 332-1063

John Vander Woude (208) 332-1037  (208) 888-4210

Josh Wheeler (208) 332-1179 (208) 360-3926

 

Please EMAIL also:

KAndrus@house.idaho.govCBruce@house.idaho.govTBurgoyne@house.idaho.gov,  DCannon@house.idaho.govBCrane@house.idaho.govJCrane@house.idaho.govJEhlers@house.idaho.govDHealey@house.idaho.govJHoltzclaw@house.idaho.govSMiller@house.idaho.govBMitchell@house.idaho.govJMonks@house.idaho.govJPalmer@house.idaho.govDPickett@house.idaho.govCShepherd@house.idaho.govJTanner@house.idaho.govSTanner@house.idaho.govJVanderWoude@house.idaho.govJoshWheeler@house.idaho.gov,

 

Link to House members Contact info: https://legislature.idaho.gov/house/membership/

Copy of HCR 10: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/HCR010.pdf

Text of HCR9: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2023/legislation/HCR009.pdf

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

More information from Eagle Forum:

https://eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html

 

Janine Hansen’s submitted testimony.

Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org

February 17, 2026

 

Chairman and Members of the Committee. My name is Janine Hansen and I represent National Eagle Forum.

 

I was intrigued when I read HJR10 which includes three separate Article V Constitutional Convention applications for proposing amendments. We can envision the jeopardy one Constitutional Convention could place our nation in with so many competing States, amendments, ideas, special interests, and political agendas. But think of having three separate Conventions. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea” in this age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.”

 

We all hope President Trump will be successful in realigning our Federal Budget. A Balanced Budget Amendment would require taxes to be increased or spending to be cut. Idaho receives 41.08% of its state revenue from the Federal Government. So, a Balanced Budget would mean Idaho would have to significantly raise taxes. Of course, in case of emergency the Balanced Budget can be set aside. President Trump has declared a state of emergency because of the border and a national energy emergency. 

 

The Convention of States language is the broadest and opens every Section of the Constitution to amendment. In fact, in the COS Pocket Guide they propose dozens of possible amendments. COS’s language “to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government,” was the purpose of the original Constitution. There was nothing wrong with the Constitution, but the 16th amendment income tax and 17th amendment direct election of Senators, both approved by the states, simply destroyed Federalism and the balance of power between the states and the federal government. Now every school district, city, county and state is controlled by the Federal government through money, grants, and mandates. As state Legislators you have the power to refuse federal money and mandates and turn back the tide of the overreaching federal government.

 

Until states get serious about rejecting federal money and mandates COS’s language of “imposing fiscal restraints on the federal government” will simply be impossible. Which state legislator as a delegate at a national Constitutional Convention will vote to defund their state of between 31% to 56% they receive from the federal government?

 

Of course, there is no language in Article V about how delegates are chosen. We can anticipate that every state will be there including California. Past Congressional bills regarding Article V rules always use the measure of the number of Electoral College votes each state has. So, California would have 54 and Idaho 4. California in 2023 passed an Article V application calling for the gutting of the Second Amendment.

 

Lastly, we have Term Limits at every election. Please vote No on HCR10. Thank you.