Eagle Forum: 200 W 3rd St., Ste. 502 • Alton, IL 62002 • 618-433-8990
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

Help Texas GOP Remove Art. V Platform Plank



From Judi Caler:

 

Emergency TEXAS GOP ACTION ALERT
Not Your Usual Blast!

 

When all else fails, sometimes Republican legislative leaders can be influenced by the grassroots of the Republican Party. This is the time of year when the grassroots meet at GOP conventions and vote on their party platform.

 

In Texas, one of the planks being considered for inclusion in the 2024 platform is to support the Convention of States application (COS), which passed in 2017—with the help of a compromise resolution to sunset COS and all future Art. V convention applications 8 years from the date of passage.

 

Thanks to you and our relentless boots on the ground, the sunset remains in place today, and the COS application is slated to expire, as intended—on May 10, 2025—unless the Republican Leadership manages to renew the application before it expires. And you can bet they're going to try again in 2025! But they don't need help from the GOP grassroots!

 

Our Mission is to Remove Plank #37 from the 2024 Republican Party Platform! Texas GOP Plank #37

 

37. Article 5 Convention of States: The Texas Legislature shall extend the call for a Convention of States to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government. See the bottom of page 6 of the GOP party platform.

A subcommittee will be taking testimony and voting on Plank #37 Monday, May 20, 2024 @ 1:00 pm (CDT). The full Platform committee will be voting on all planks on Wednesday, May 22.

 

So please get your letter in before Monday's meeting if possible, and if not, by Tuesday!

 

Your Letter to 2024 Platform Committee Members

 

The talking points are at the end of this blast.

 

Please write all 31 GOP Platform Committee Members, and ask them to REMOVE Plank #37 (Art. V Convention) from the party platform. They need to know why you're opposed to an Article V Convention.

 

Also, please emphasize, in your own words, that this issue is heated and splitting the party during an election year.

 

A short letter is more likely to be read. So it's best to focus on one talking point per letter.
 

Platform Committee Members' Addresses

 

(Copy the addresses below as a block into “BCC,” and copy your own address into the “To” box; and place "Plank #37" and perhaps something catchy on the subject line.)

 

Texas GOP Platform Committee Members (31)—Dear Platform Committee Member:

 

matthewgpatrick@aol.comdyork.tx@aol.comDennis.london@gmail.comtony.robertson@rocketmail.comDALE77304@GMAIL.COMmichelleevansfortexas@gmail.commarga0207@gmail.comjr.haas4liberty@gmail.comAccordingtokallas@att.netgop_3247_tx@yahoo.comcarycheshire@gmail.comgina@drginasmith.comccastilla@sbcglobal.netprecinctchair0490@gmail.comtxdra@yahoo.comgbrianvachris@att.netbriankbodine@gmail.compbatura@reagan.comcarter.thomas@frontier.comwlausterman@me.comandrewduartesr@gmail.comgop.terryharper@gmail.comjon@jonrker.comelaine@sd23texas.orgajeller921@att.netpatrick@votepatrick.orgMelindaRoberts@kw.comIsela.ccrw@gmail.comdanpick46@gmail.comDunhamMark@yahoo.comchristine.whitmore@protonmail.comLILYELLOWBUS37@GMAIL.COM,


Talking Points

 

Please choose one or write your own letter.

 

"State Legislatures cannot dictate Amendments to be considered at an Art. V Convention" (flyer) shows that Lobbyists' assurances that a convention would be limited to considering only amendments requested by 34 State Legislatures are false. A proposed Congressional "call," H.CON.RES. 24 (2023-2024), proves that Congress may count all applications together—including centuries-old, obsolete applications on any subject, including gun control, to reach the 34-state threshold! This contradicts what State Legislators are being told to secure their votes on the applications.

 

"State Legislatures have no power to select & control Delegates" (flyer) shows that those who promise that State Legislators will select and control the Delegates are making stuff up! No one can predict how the convention Delegates will be selected or what the convention rules will be. The delegate-selection process is up to Congress, and the rules are up to the Delegates. Delegates would have more power than State Legislatures and are not subject to state law—including the restrictions in state applications and unfaithful delegate laws. No one has power over Delegates!

 

"George Mason Never Said It!" shows that James Madison warned that those who secretly wish for a new Constitution would push for an Article V Convention under the pretext of getting Amendments. No Framer, including George Mason, ever said that the convention method was added to Article V in order to rein in the federal government, should it become tyrannical.

 

The “Brilliant Men” flyer shows that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, four US Supreme Court Justices, and other jurists and scholars warned that Delegates to an Article V convention can't be controlled.

 

The "Myths v. Facts" flyer exposes a number of the false assurances made by the convention lobby. You can copy and paste one myth & fact into a short letter and link the entire flyer, if you wish. Or write your own letter using information from this flyer.

 

The "Declaration of Independence” flyer shows why Delegates to an Article V convention have the power to throw off the Constitution we have and set up a new one, with a new and easier mode of ratification.
 

Talking Points Specific to COS

 

The Phony Petitions & Polls flyer tells of how, during 2018, two Idaho Legislators reported that the "Convention of States" petitions they received were digitally "signed" by some constituents who, when contacted, said they never signed. Rep. Priscilla Giddings (R) called this practice "hi-tech fraud." Former Rep. Dorothy Moon (R) called it "dirty tricks."

 

"Dark Money—Not the Grassroots—Is Behind the Convention of States Organizations (COS)" proves that almost 2/3 of the money driving COS's effort to apply to Congress for an Article V Convention, is coming from major donors giving COS $5,000 to $2,000,000 over the latest 3 years of reporting available. Right out of the gate, Convention of States was funded with over $1 million in seed money and a big salary. Why are billionaires trying to get their hands on our Constitution?

 

"COS adopts Newspeak to sell the Con-Con" debunks the Convention of States' (COS) narrative that a convention called under Article V is different than a “constitutional convention.” COS is waging a semantics war by using the term "convention of states" to imply that an Art. V Convention is controlled from start to finish by State Legislatures. We're all talking about the same thing—a convention called by Congress under Article V of the US Constitution. Any convention dealing with drafting or amending a constitution is a constitutional convention.

 

"COS Board Member shows that an Art. V Convention (A5C) can result in a new Constitution" (flyer) highlights the fact that Convention of States (COS) board member Robert P. George has already co-drafted a new constitution that grants massive powers to a new federal government & imposes gun control with red flag confiscations! It shows why an A5C provides the opportunity, under the pretext of seeking amendments, to replace our Constitution and its ratification process.
 

Still More Talking Points

 

1. An Article V Convention is controversial and causing a split in our party. Republicans could be working together on important issues instead. Please delete Plank #37 from the Party Platform! (This can be included, in your own words, with any other talking point.)

 

2. Ratification by 3/4 of the states is not a safeguard against a runaway convention. Delegates to the Convention can change the ratification process and make it easier as they did when they set a precedent in 1787. Under the Articles of Confederation, all 13 states plus the Continental Congress were required for ratification. Yet only 9 states were sufficient to ratify our current Constitution. See Article VII.

 

3. A vote to keep plank 37 is a vote for gun control and a runaway convention. The subjects of the Convention of States' applications sound good, but the convention can't be limited to those subjects. Gavin Newsom and George Soros also want a convention for their purposes. The entire Constitution would be up for grabs at a convention.

 

4. Glenn Beck reversed his support for the Convention of States saying, "We are not the people to open up this sacred document."

 

5. Congress has never called a convention under Article V. No one knows what will happen!

 

6. Convention of States tells you that states control Delegates, but a government official cannot be prosecuted in the official execution of his duties. Do you trust the 60 Republicans, who voted to impeach Paxton, to select and manage delegates to a convention with the power to rewrite our Constitution?

 

7. The Constitution isn't the problem! It needs to be enforced, not amended! Thank you for defending our Constitution! 


Victory IDAHO! All 3 Art V's Constitutional Convention applications DEAD!

April 11, 2024
Janine Hansen, Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Please share with friends and family.

We need your help!!!

Praise the Lord!

Miracle victory in Idaho! Yesterday the Idaho Legislature ended. The three Article V’s Convention of States, Balanced Budget Amendment, and Term Limits never received a vote on the Senate Floor so they are DEAD!

 

When we began this fight three months ago it seemed very unlikely that we could be successful in defeating the Convention of States lobby. (See the Article Below about all the money they spent in Idaho.) The pro-convention lobby had radio advertisements from Florida Governor DeSantis and others. Former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum on the COS payroll testified in the Committee. Former Senator Larry Craig testified in favor of the Balanced Budget Amendment Article V. Big money and Big people are supporting Article V’s Constitutional Convention applications.

 

THANK YOU!!! TO ALL THE INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO HELPED FLOOD THE LEGISLATURE REPEATEDLY WITH EMAILS OPPOSING THE ARTICLE V’s.

 

Some of the Organizations that deserve special thanks are:

National Eagle Forum, the John Birch Society and their local coordinators, Guard the Constitution, Campaign for Liberty, Idaho Second Amendment Alliance, National Gun Rights Association, Citizens Against an Article V Convention, Idaho Constitution Party.

 

I’m sure there are others. I love to know who you are. Director@nevadafamilies.org

 

Thank you for all of your EMAILS!!! Janine Hansen

 

Idaho Article V Constitutional Convention Applications

All DEAD

 

SCR 112 Convention of States waiting for a vote in the whole Senate.

SCR 114 Term Limits waiting for a vote in the whole Senate.

SCR 115 Balanced Budget Amendment waiting for a vote in the whole Senate.

 

http://inlandnwreport.com/2024/02/23/convention-of-states-action-shenanigans/

INLAND NW REPORT

 

Convention of States Actions Shenanigans

 

By Karen Schumacher

 

The Convention of States Action (COSA) conducted some groundwork prior to its coming into Idaho and promoting its calling for a Convention of States to the legislature. COSA had over $8 million dollars in revenue in 2022.

 

COSA also had a Convention of States Political Fund (COSPF) in 2022, and a political action committee called Conservative Action for Idaho PAC (CAI). When the Convention of States Political Fund is searched under the donor box on the Idaho Secretary of State (SOS) site, it shows that all contributions are made to the CAI. When Conservative Action for Idaho is searched under the Candidates & PACs box, it shows how money was spent, a large part going to advertising agencies.

 

On the 01/01/2021 to 12/31/2021 CAI Campaign Financial Disclosure Report Summary, shows contributions were made to the Idaho Republican Party. Much of this money went to Republican committees located throughout the state, but there were also contributions to individual candidates and different organizations. Some of those organizations included $20,000 to Melaleuca Inc; $6,000 to Beco Construction Company; $10,000 to Richard And Peggy Larsen Farms; $10,000 to TransCanada Pipeline U.S.A.; $20,000 to Idaho Land Fund; $5,000 to Idaho Conservative Growth Fund; and $5,000 to Idaho Victory Fund, which has its own nefarious background.
 

Candidates receiving money included $1,000 to Julie Yamamoto; $2,000 to Jim Rice; $1,000 to Mary Souza; $1,000 to Macomber For Idaho Attorney General; $500.00 to Blanksma For Idaho; $500.00 to McGrane For Idaho; $1,500.00 to Chuck Winder; $500.00 to Wendy Horman; $250.00 to Laura Lickley; and $250.00 to Dustin Manwaring.
 

In 2022, CAI spent thousands of dollars in opposition to and support of Idaho candidates through advertising agencies, $36,217.00 was spent just in April 2022, and $69,704.24 in May. Amounts paid to individual advertising agencies can be found here, along with amounts spent to oppose Judy Boyle and support Rep. Syme, Mike Kingsley, James Holtzclaw, Barbara Ehardt, Mike Moyle, and Kelly Anthon. On this April 2022 CAI Disclosure form, $5,100.00 was paid to “The Political” on the 25th to oppose Judy Boyle (pg 14). This is a firm in Louisiana whose work is to get candidates elected.

 

This CAI Disclosure form shows that COSPF made contributions to the CAI in the amounts of $50,000 and $10,000 on separate dates in May, 2022. No Super Pac called the “Convention of States Political Fund” could be found on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) website.
 

Also, there were two contributions made to CAI by Conservative Action for America (CAA), one on April 20 for $1,000 and another for $50,000 made on April 25, 2022. In 2022, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) alleged that COSPF founder, Richard Johnson, formed CAA “in Arizona to hide the identity of major donors to its super PAC.” Conservative Action for America cannot be found as a PAC when searched on the Arizona website from 2020-2024. CMD also alleged that “Conservative Action for America used a fake address to register as a nonprofit there.” In MontanaCOSPF was found guilty of violating campaign laws by “by failing to adequately disclose its in-state activity with his office.” In another 2022 complaint filed against COSPF in Montana, Richard A. Johnson is listed as the treasurer on page 2.
 

Looking at this 2022 CAI Campaign Financial Disclosure Report Summary, Conservative Action for America is listed on page three with the same Arizona address. The reason this is so confusing is there are two separate Conservative Action for America groups, both created by COSA individuals.
 

This 990 tax form lists CAA Inc. as a corporate 501(c)(4) non-profit in Arizona with over two million dollars in total revenue and RJ Johnson as president. The only information that could be found on RJ Johnson is here.
 

There is also the CAA PAC, Conservative Action for America PAC in Virginia, that was a FEC registered Super PAC from 7/22 through 2023 with Mark Meckler as treasurer.
 

Donors aren’t listed, however CAA “Inc.” made contributions: $600,000 to American Principles Project; $30,000 to Citizens Against Expanded Gambling; $51,000 to Conservative Action for America PAC; $51,000 to Conservative Action for Idaho; $876,000 to Convention of States Action; $677,000 to Convention of States Political Fund; $49,000 to Stop Prop 1 in DC; and $160,000 to Wisconsin Alliance for Reform.
 

When looking at CAA “PAC” donations received, a Crownquest individual donated $1 million dollars to the CAA “PAC.” Tim Dunn is the Crownquest CEO and is on the Board of Directors for the Convention of States. CAA “Inc” in Arizona gave $51,000 to the CAA PAC. The FEC registered Super PAC, Congressional Reform Fund, whose treasurer was Mark Meckler, also gave $39,637 to the CAA “PAC.” All documents of the Congressional Reform Fund, which terminated in August 2022, can be found here, Timothy Dunn contributed a total of $65,000 to the Congressional Reform Fund Super Pac.

 

Under the expenditures tab, the CAA “PAC” paid $500,000 to Secure Our Freedom Action Fund; $10,000 to Johnson Jordahl; and $7,000 to Koch & Hoos.
 

COSA, through its PACs, spent money to have specific Idaho legislators supported while targeting Rep. Boyle in opposition, and engaging in the same activity in other states.

There is also a CAI Campaign Financial Disclosure Report Summary from 6/1/22 to 6/30/22 showing its expenditures.

 

501(c)(4) groups have very specific limitations on how money can be used and distributed, especially related to campaign finance.

While this may be considered “dark money” as was suggested by CMD and others, most information about where the money came from, who is involved, and how that money is shuffled around has been fairly easy to find, with a few exceptions. This all feels more like a slush fund or sloppy shell game. What is striking, is all of it was shut down when the campaign law violations were filed against COSPF in June, 2022 in Montana.
 

The flow of money is difficult to follow but basically it is all the work of Mark Meckler and his cohortscreating organizations, funding them, shuffling the money around, then getting into trouble and shutting the organizations down. They aren’t alone, much has been written about how these activities undermine our election process. How did America get to this? Well, it was a Supreme Court case that sanctioned this activity, it isn’t even regulated. Do corporations have free speech rights?

 

The CMD attacks billionaires for dumping money towards the right, and the right goes after those funders of the left like Soros. Round and round we go. These people are in their own little bubble creating whirlwinds of chaos for the rest of us.
 

Certainly, the Founders did not have money thrown at them to support only certain positions, or wealthy organizations using their money to influence the populous in one direction or another. Why has this been allowed? Why even bother voting when there is so much monetary malfeasance behind the political arena? Are potential candidates and incumbents for office cognizant of these monetary games in which they are the pawns? Where do billionaires get off thinking they, through their wealth, can change the course of a country and how people should live, vote, or even think? Can they not find a better, more positive way in which to spend their riches? Surely, somewhere, some kids need new shoes and clothes.
 

And now, Idaho legislators are being duped into thinking that a Convention of States is a marvelous avenue to pursue. This agenda is not grassroots, or even from Idaho citizens. It originates with a bunch of individuals who have money and because of that, think they can pay their way into states and lead a charge for the Lord only knows what reason. Do legislators really want to tangle Idaho up with an organization that has such questionable backgrounds and activities? If legislators were made aware of this and other COSA activity, would they support SCR 112 or the other related bills?

 

It got this far because we as the self-governed have failed to do our job in holding elected officials accountable, scrutinizing every aspect of what they do, and who they are choosing to follow. Let elected officials know this suspicious resolution should not be passed.