Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman
Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, director@nevadafamilies.org
February 10, 2026, In the Year of Our Lord
Please share with friends and family.
We need your help!!!
Vote Expected Tomorrow or Thursday
Correction on bill number. This is an identical bill to the House and so it is an expedited bill.
Arizona ALERT! SCR1011 (congressional term limits; Article V Constitutional Convention) passed the House and the Senate Committee and is now headed to a vote of the full Senate.
MESSAGE: Please vote no on SCR1011 an Article V Constitutional Convention for term limits. There is nothing in Article V that limits a Convention to one subject. Don’t put our Constitution in jeopardy. Please stand strong against HCR2034. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information below.
Contact these 3 Senators who previously voted No and ask them to stand strong in defending our Constitution and vote no on SCR1011.
Sen. David C. Farnsworth (R - LD10) 602-926-3387
Sen. Mark Finchem (R - LD1) 602-926-3631
Sen. Wendy Rogers (R- LD7) 602-926-3042
EMAILS: Copy and Paste for Senators:
dfarnsworth@azleg.gov, mfinchem@azleg.gov, wrogers@azleg.gov
Contact these 3 Senators and ask them to defend our Sacred Constitution and vote No on SCR1011.
Sen. Hildy Angius (R - LD30) 602-926-5051
Sen. Carine Werner (R-LD4) 602-926-3673
Sen. Jake Hoffman (R- LD15) 602-926-3292
EMAILS for Senators: Copy and Paste:
hangius@azleg.gov, cwerner@azleg.gov, jake.hoffman@azleg.gov
Phyllis Schlafly the founder of Eagle Forum, often quoted Chief Justice Warren Burger as the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”
http://www.eagleforum.org/
In addition, in 2015, the New Jersey Law Journal reported that Supreme Court Justice “Scalia called it ‘a horrible idea’ to hold a constitutional convention in this age of special interests.”
Article V of the U.S. Constitution:
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
