Eagle Forum: 200 W 3rd St., Ste. 502 • Alton, IL 62002 • 618-433-8990

ARIZONA vote Mon 1:15 pm Constitutional Convention!

 


ARIZONA Oppose:

HCR 2041 Article V Constitutional Convention for Congressional Term Limits

 

HCR 2041 is going to the Floor on Monday at 1:15pm for debate and could be voted on by the full House. A new bill HB2931, “delegate” legislation tries to take away fears of an Article V Constitutional Convention. It could be used by proponents of a Convention to fool other legislators into supporting a Constitutional Convention.

 

Please Contact the Republican House members listed below.

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HCR 2041 an Article V Constitutional Convention on Congressional Term Limits. We have term limits every election. There is no way to limit an Article V Convention to just Term Limits. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea” in this age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.” Don’t be fooled by a delegate bill. It won’t stop any of the dangers of an Article V Convention.

(Or better yet write your own message.) More information below.

 

CONTACT:

These members have previously voted against an Article V convention; term limits bill. Please thank them and ask them to vote no on HCR 2041.

Rep. Leo Biasiucci 602-926-3018

Rep. Lupe Diaz     602-926-4852

Rep. Rachel Jones 602-926-3558

Rep. Teresa Martinez      602-926-3158

Rep. Khyl Powell     602-926-3415

 

EMAILS: Copy and Paste:

lbiasiucci@azleg.gov, ldiaz@azleg.gov, rkeshel@azleg.gov (Rachel Jones), tmartinez@azleg.gov, kpowell@azleg.gov

 

CONTACT:

New Republican legislators:

Rep. Walt Blackman    602-926-3244

Rep. Pamela Carter     602-926-3153

Rep. Lisa Fink    602-926-3516

Rep. Ralph Heap       602-926-3381

Rep. Nick Kupper     602-926-3512

Rep. Chris Lopez      602-926-3445

Rep. James Taylor     602-926-3564

Rep. Julie Willoughby   602-926-4153

 

Emails Copy and Paste:

wblackman@azleg.gov, pcarter@azleg.gov,  lfink@azleg.gov,    

rheap@azleg.gov,  rkeshel@azleg.gov, nkupper@azleg.gov,  

clopez@azleg.gov, jtaylor@azleg.gov jwilloughby@azleg.gov   

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

More information from Eagle Forum:

https://eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html

 

Justice Scalia’s comments recorded by David Gialanella, New Jersey Law Journal, May 8, 2015

 

Copy of HCR2041: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/1R/bills/HCR2041P.htm

Copy of HB2931 Delegate bill: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/1R/bills/HB2931P.pdf


Further Information:

IDAHO Hearing Mon Feb 17, 1:30 pm - 3 Constitutional Conventions!



IDAHO HJR10

Article V Constitutional Convention with

3 Separate Applications


Including the Balancing of the Federal Budget, from the Convention of States: imposing fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government, and Term Limits.

 

Hearing on Monday, February 17 at 1:30pm, in the House Judiciary, Rules and Administration Committee, Room EW-42.

 

Register to testify remotely: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/standingcommittees/hjud/#hcode-tab-style2testimony-registration-remote-in-person

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HJR10 which makes applications to Congress for 3 separate Article V Constitutional Conventions for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. There is no way to limit an Article V Convention. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea”. After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda. Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information is below. My submitted testimony is below.

 

Please CONTACT the Republican House Committee members listed below.

 

CONTACT Representatives:  (Emails below)

Chair: Bruce D. Skaug: (208) 332-1178

Vice Chair: Joe Alfieri: (208) 332-1065

Barbara Ehardt: (208) 332-1189

Marco Adam Erickson: (208) 332-1073

Dan Garner: (208) 332-1081

Clay Handy: (208) 332-1074

Dale R. Hawkins: (208) 332-1070

Edward H. “Ted” Hill: (208) 332-1124

Clint Hostetler:  (208) 332-1024

Mike J. Pohanka: (208) 332-1174

Heather Scott: (208) 332-1190

John Shirts: (208) 332-1166

 

EMAILS: Chair: BSkaug@house.idaho.gov, Committee Republican members:

JAlfieri@house.idaho.gov, BEhardt@house.idaho.gov, MErickson@house.idaho.gov,

DGarner@house.idaho.gov, CHandy@house.idaho.gov, DHawkins@house.idaho.gov,

THill@house.idaho.gov, CHostetler@house.idaho.gov, MPohanka@house.idaho.gov, HScott@house.idaho.gov, JShirts@house.idaho.gov,

 

Copy of HCR 10: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/HCR010.pdf

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

More information from Eagle Forum:

https://eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html

 

Janine Hansen’s submitted testimony.

Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Janine Hansen, 775-397-6859, janine@janinehansen.com

February 17, 2026

 

Chairman and Members of the Committee. My name is Janine Hansen and I represent National Eagle Forum.

 

I was intrigued when I read HJR10 which includes three separate Article V Constitutional Convention applications for proposing amendments. We can envision the jeopardy one Constitutional Convention could place our nation in with so many competing States, amendments, ideas, special interests, and political agendas. But think of having three separate Conventions. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea” in this age of special interests. “Once you get those people together, you never know what they’re going to do.”

 

We all hope President Trump will be successful in realigning our Federal Budget. A Balanced Budget Amendment would require taxes to be increased or spending to be cut. Idaho receives 41.08% of its state revenue from the Federal Government. So, a Balanced Budget would mean Idaho would have to significantly raise taxes. Of course, in case of emergency, the Balanced Budget can be set aside. President Trump has declared a state of emergency because of the border and a national energy emergency. 

 

The Convention of States language is the broadest and opens every Section of the Constitution to amendment. In fact, in the COS Pocket Guide, they propose dozens of possible amendments. COS’s language “to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government,” was the purpose of the original Constitution. There was nothing wrong with the Constitution, but the 16th Amendment income tax and 17th Amendment direct election of Senators, both approved by the states, simply destroyed Federalism and the balance of power between the states and the federal government. Now every school district, city, county, and state is controlled by the Federal government through money, grants, and mandates. As State Legislators you have the power to refuse federal money and mandates and turn back the tide of the overreaching federal government.

 

Until states get serious about rejecting federal money and mandates COS’s language of “imposing fiscal restraints on the federal government” will simply be impossible. Which state legislator as a delegate at a national Constitutional Convention will vote to defund their state of between 31% to 56% they receive from the federal government?

 

Of course, there is no language in Article V about how delegates are chosen. We can anticipate that every state will be there including California. Past Congressional bills regarding Article V rules always use the measure of the number of Electoral College votes each state has. So, California would have 54 and Idaho 4. California in 2023 passed an Article V application calling for the gutting of the Second Amendment.

 

Lastly, we have Term Limits at every election. Please vote No on HCR10. Thank you.


MONTANA Hearing Feb 17 Noon Constitutional Convention Commissioners bill



Alert Montana!

Article V Commissioners bill for a Constitutional Convention

 

SB120: HEARING February 17, 12:00 noon,  Room 472 House Legislative Administration Committee on SB120 Article V Constitutional Convention Commissioners bill.

 

You can participate by attending the hearing and testifying.

Or Sign up to testify on Zoom at least 2 hours before the hearing at this link: https://participate.legmt.gov/

You can submit written testimony at the same link.

 

CONTACT the House members below.

 

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on SB120 the Commissioner's bill which will not work. The remedy in SB120 for controlling the Montana Commissioners and Delegation at a Constitutional Convention is to RECALL the Commissioners and Delegation. However, if Montana’s delegation is recalled because they have “exceeded their authority”… the Article V Constitutional Convention will continue, but WITHOUT any representation from Montana. AND the Convention’s actions to amend the U.S. Constitution will continue without Montana. The only purpose of a commissioner's bill is to take away our concerns but it won’t work. (Or better yet write your own message) Much more information is below.

 

Please CONTACT these Republican members of the House Legislative Administration Committee:

 

Chair: George.Nikolakakos@legmt.gov, Kenneth.Walsh@legmt.gov, Lee.Deming@legmt.gov, Terry.Falk@legmt.gov, Greg.Kmetz@legmt.gov, Gary.Parry@legmt.gov, Amy.Regier@legmt.gov, Lukas.Schubert@legmt.gov

 

Copy of SB120: https://bills.legmt.gov/#/laws/bill/2/LC1789?open_tab=bill

 

Oppose Commissioner Limitation Bill for an

Article V Constitutional Convention

By Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman Janine Hansen, director@nevadafamilies.org 775-397-6859

 

If you oppose an Article V Constitutional Convention, then you must oppose any commissioner limitation bill. The purpose of SB120, the Montana commissioner limitation bill, is to alleviate your fears about what may actually happen at an Article V Constitutional Convention. But the limitation bill will not work.

 

The remedy in SB120 for controlling the Montana Commissioners and Delegation at a Convention is to RECALL the Commissioners and Delegation. However, if Montana’s delegation is recalled because they have “exceeded their authority”… the Article V Constitutional Convention will continue, but WITHOUT any representation from Montana. AND the Convention’s actions to amend the Constitution will continue without Montana.

 

SB120 makes the flawed assumption that a Convention will allow only one vote per state. That is preposterous!

 

“Between 1973 and 1992, 22 bills were introduced in the U.S. House and 19 in the U.S. Senate that sought to establish a procedural framework that would apply to an Article V Convention…The Senate…passed constitutional Convention procedures bills, the ‘Federal Constitutional Convention Procedures Act,’ on two separate occasions; as S 215 in 1971 and as S 1272 in 1983.” Source Congressional Research Service, April 11, 2014.

 

These bills called for proportional representation of States based on the formula for the Electoral College. None suggested one vote per state as SB120 does. With this historic precedence, it is folly to assume that Congress would not determine in legislation the formula for state representation, as a prerequisite for calling a convention. Again it is folly to assume that any formula could pass Congress without obtaining the necessary votes from large population States that would insist on proportional representation. 

 

Why would California with 54 Electoral votes, Texas with 38, New York and Florida with 29 each, voluntarily vote themselves such a huge disadvantage to be equal in a Convention to states like Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, North and South Dakota with 3 or 4 Electoral votes each? It is not reasonable to assume that politically it could possibly happen.

 

Article V does not give states the power to limit the actions of commissioners. Article V gives Congress the power to Call the Convention which includes, by implication, making the rules. In Article 1 Section 7 clause 18, the Constitution gives Congress the power, “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department of Office thereof.”

 

Right now the proponents of the Article V Constitutional Convention, because they have failed to reach the 34 states constitutionally required threshold, are finding new ways to COUNT. They are adding together diverse subjects of Article V State Applications from as long ago as one from New York in 1789. They add others from the Civil War era, some opposing polygamy, and still others calling for the direct election of Senators which is already part of the Constitution….to make their argument that they have reached the required 34 states. They also added that many of the 12 states, like Montana, rescinded all of their previous applications for an Article V Convention. All of that is astonishing! And as crooked as stealing an election, except they will steal our beloved Constitution instead!

 

Another concern is that proponents who claim to want a limited Article V Constitutional Convention have lists of amendments they propose themselves, for instance, Mark Levin in his book promotes eleven amendments, Governor Greg Abbott of Texas wants nine amendments and the Convention of States Pocket Guide promotes an unlimited plethora of amendments..

 

Phyllis Schlafly the founder of Eagle Forum often quoted Chief Justice Warren Burger as the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

Who do you trust with your Constitution today? Unelected appointed delegates to a Constitutional Convention who will never face the voters?


IDAHO Alert: Article V Constitutional Conventions!



Please share with Friends and Family.

We need your help!

 

IDAHO HJR10 Article V

Constitutional Conventions with 3 Separate Applications

Including the Balancing of the Federal Budget, from the Convention of States: imposing fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government, and Term Limits.

 

We anticipate a hearing on Monday, February 17, at 1:30 p.m., in the House Judiciary, Rules and Administration Committee, Room EW-42. It is not confirmed at this time. However, it’s time to contact the committee members.

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HJR10 which makes applications to Congress for 3 separate Article V Constitutional Conventions for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. There is no way to limit an Article V Convention. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea”. After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda. Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information is below.

 

Please CONTACT the Republican House Committee members listed below.

 

CONTACT Representatives: (Emails below)

Chair: Bruce D. Skaug: (208) 332-1178

Vice Chair: Joe Alfieri: (208) 332-1065

Barbara Ehardt: (208) 332-1189

Marco Adam Erickson: (208) 332-1073

Dan Garner: (208) 332-1081

Clay Handy: (208) 332-1074

Dale R. Hawkins: (208) 332-1070

Edward H. “Ted” Hill: (208) 332-1124

Clint Hostetler: (208) 332-1024

Mike J. Pohanka: (208) 332-1174

Heather Scott: (208) 332-1190

John Shirts: (208) 332-1166

 

EMAILS: Chair: BSkaug@house.idaho.gov,

Republican Committee members:

JAlfieri@house.idaho.gov, BEhardt@house.idaho.gov, MErickson@house.idaho.gov,

DGarner@house.idaho.gov, CHandy@house.idaho.gov, DHawkins@house.idaho.gov,

THill@house.idaho.gov, CHostetler@house.idaho.gov, MPohanka@house.idaho.gov, HScott@house.idaho.gov, JShirts@house.idaho.gov,

 

Copy of HCR 10: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/HCR010.pdf

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

 

 

Further Information:

MONTANA Hearing Mon Feb 10 3pm Art. V Constitutional Convention Term Limits




February 9, 2025
Janine Hansen, Eagle Forum National Constitutional Issues Chairman

Please share with friends and family.

We need your help!!!

One More Article V Constitutional Convention this time on Term Limits

 

Montana House Energy, Technology, and Federal Relations Committee;

HEARING: on HJ 13, Monday, February 10, 3:00pm MT, Room 472. Remote Testimony sign up in advance: https://www.legmt.gov/participate/

 

US Term Limits is testifying around the country saying that they don’t really want an Article V Convention, but that they want to scare Congress into passing a Term Limits Amendment. That’s not what HJ 13 says. It makes an application for an Article V Constitutional Convention. We should not pay chicken with the Constitution.

 

Please CONTACT the Republican House Committee members listed below.

 

MESSAGE: Please vote NO on HJ 13 an Article V Constitutional Convention on Congressional Term Limits. We have term limits every election. Limiting an Article V Convention to just Term Limits is impossible. Conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia called an Article V convention a “horrible idea”. After the convention is convened the Convention will set its own rules and agenda. Liberal states like California and New York will all be there with radical agendas to eliminate the Electoral College and repeal the Second Amendment. Please don’t play chicken with our Constitution for term limits which we have every election. (Or better yet write your own message.) More information is below.

 

CONTACT: Republican Committee members:

Chair: Gary.Parry@legmt.gov, Greg.Kmetz@legmt.gov,

Larry.Brewster@legmt.gov, Paul.Fielder@legmt.gov, Tom.Millett@legmt.gov, Braxton.Mitchell@legmt.gov, Tracy.Sharp@legmt.gov, Katie.Zolnikov@legmt.gov,

 

Chief Justice Warren Burger is the highest authority in the United States to ever speak out on a Constitutional Convention. He stated: “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the convention if we don’t like its agenda…”

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon/pdf/WarrenBurger-letter.pdf

More information from Eagle Forum:

https://eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html

 

Justice Scalia’s comments recorded by David Gialanella, New Jersey Law Journal, May 8, 2015

Further Information: